The race to attract international productions is redefining the competitive landscape: incentive percentages may open the conversation, but what actually closes the deal?
In the global race to land international shoots, tax incentives don’t seem to be the main attraction anymore—or at least, they’re no longer the dealbreaker. Across Ibero-America, territories are now competing on something far more complex—and way more decisive: their ability to position themselves as solid production hubs that actually deliver “certainty.”
For years, a country’s appeal was basically measured by its cash rebate percentage. Not so much anymore. Today, the execs calling the shots at Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Warner Bros. Discovery are looking at a different checklist: regulatory predictability, turnaround times, reliable payments, operational efficiency—and, above all, the strength of the local industry.
The incentive percentage might get the conversation started, but what really closes the deal is whether a territory can walk the talk—and how fast it can do it.
The shift in paradigm is clear: offering attractive fiscal benefits is no longer enough. The territories that are gaining ground are those that have built comprehensive ecosystems—combining incentives, talent, infrastructure, and stability.
The equation is becoming increasingly evident: a high incentive without guarantees loses value against more modest but predictable schemes. This change in logic has elevated the role of Film Commissions, which now operate as true “certainty managers,” reducing friction and supporting investment decisions.
The creation of Iberofic marks a turning point. It is a platform that brings together more than 150 Film Commissions and film offices from Spain, Portugal, and Latin America, and claims to represent 95% of the region’s incentives. Its explicit mission is to coordinate resources—such as rebates, tax credits, and permitting facilitation—to attract international investment, while also strengthening local talent and industry.
Mexico holds a unique position on this map. Traditionally, the country has attracted international shoots more because of its industrial strength than the aggressiveness of its incentives. Mexico City has established itself as Latin America’s audiovisual capital, with a combination of studios, rental houses, postproduction and VFX providers, and crews capable of supporting multiple premium productions simultaneously.
In 2026, Mexico took an additional step, aligning its incentive policy with this industrial reality. The federal government announced a new fiscal incentive of up to 30% of qualifying spend in the country for audiovisual productions, applicable against income tax. The benefit is capped at MXN 40 million per project and requires that a significant portion of the spend (around 70%) be carried out with local companies and services, ensuring a direct impact on the domestic industry.
Regarding the specific case of producing in Mexico, ttvnews spoke with Mariano César, Head of General Entertainment Content at Warner Bros. Discovery for Latin America and US Hispanic, who noted that the choice of shooting location is closely tied to the infrastructure it offers. “It’s about where we can be excellent at what we do,” he said.
"Mexico plays a leading role due to its demographic weight and the size of its market. There may be very large countries that are not yet ready to fully embrace streaming and enable us to produce content there. We need an industry that is prepared and where talent is available. In Mexico’s case, all those conditions are met. There is a long tradition of content creators, along with a wealth of new voices, emerging talent, and a thriving creative scene."
Spain is perhaps the clearest example of how an Ibero-American country can use incentives not only to attract shoots, but to reshape its industry. The country offers a tax deduction system that allows producers to recover around 30% of the first €1 million invested and 25% of the remainder, with enhanced schemes in regions such as Navarra and, above all, the Canary Islands.
The Canary Islands have established themselves as one of the most competitive destinations worldwide, thanks to an incentive that can reach close to 50% for international productions, supported by a special tax regime (REF) and a highly active Film Commission. Academic studies and economic analyses promoted by Spain Film Commission show that these rebates generate multiplier effects in employment, regional GDP, tourism, and knowledge transfer—shifting the conversation from “how much do we return?” to “what kind of value do we build with each shoot?”
It is no coincidence that Spain Film Commission is one of the key partners of Iberofic. The country positions itself as the European gateway to the Ibero-American hub, and as a methodological benchmark in impact measurement and data-driven policy design.
In South America, Colombia has pursued an aggressive incentive strategy to position itself as a recurring partner for major international productions. The CINA program (Audiovisual Investment Certificate in Colombia) grants tax credits of up to 35% on local audiovisual services spend, applicable to film, series, animation, advertising, and video games.
The person who turned that legal framework into an international attraction strategy is Claudia Triana, director of Proimágenes Colombia. Under her leadership, the country went from receiving around six annual applications to the Colombia Film Fund (FFC) between 2012 and 2020, to selecting more than 30 projects in 2024.
The pitch that Proimágenes has taken to the global market is backed by hard numbers: more than 18 projects with Sony and 29 with Netflix, according to the agency. This is where it becomes clear that the equation is not just fiscal—it’s operational: skilled crews, legal certainty, and proven logistics.
In media statements, Triana noted that production companies that have already worked in Colombia want to return—and that has been the key to its success. She also pointed out that shooting in Colombia can be 30% to 40% more cost-efficient than in Mexico or Brazil, an advantage that studios and platforms have already factored into their greenlight decisions.
Uruguay does not compete in volume with Colombia or Spain. Its strategy, led by the Instituto del Cine y Audiovisual del Uruguay, targets a different segment: international production companies that value agility, operational predictability, and minimal bureaucratic friction over the size of the local market.
Uruguay’s model operates as a boutique offering: clear incentives, strict compliance, and crews that, while smaller in scale, are highly skilled. International productions such as Conquest have chosen Uruguay precisely for that combination. It is not a territory for mega-productions, but rather for projects that require certainty of execution and a reliable institutional counterpart.
In this context, Argentina stands out as one of the most paradigmatic cases in the region. With a widely recognized creative and technical capacity—two Academy Awards and 19 Goya Awards in the Ibero-American category since 1987—the country has long been a breeding ground for internationally acclaimed talent and high-quality content.
However, Argentina faces severe structural challenges in terms of incentives and predictability. INCAA did not approve a single national film in 2024, marking the first year without approvals since its creation in 1968. Argentine films, which once accounted for around 10% of the domestic box office, dropped to just 2%.
The work of the Buenos Aires Film Commission, which runs the BA Producción Internacional program offering a 20% cash rebate for shoots in the city, reflects ongoing efforts to maintain the territory’s position in the global circuit. The initiative, which in its first edition selected 12 productions in partnership with companies such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Buena Vista International, shows that both institutional capacity and market demand are in place.
The contrast is striking: while the Film Commission moves forward with regional coordination, the national support framework remains stalled. And in this business, a lack of alignment across audiovisual policy levels carries a tangible cost—one that international producers factor into their decision-making.
In the global audiovisual industry, it is no longer about who offers more, but who offers better. The territories that understood this early on have years of advantage. Those that still believe strong locations are enough are competing on a different playing field altogether.
Because behind every international shoot there is more than a fiscal incentive: there is a promise of execution—time, quality, and money. And in a business where every shooting day counts, that promise—when it becomes certainty—is the most valuable asset a territory can offer.